Conflicts of interest in human subjects research are often framed as financial or easily identifiable—but many of the most challenging situations IRBs face are far less clear. Dual roles, institutional pressures, close professional relationships, and advisory involvement can all create real or perceived conflicts that are difficult to define and even harder to manage consistently.
This flash learn focuses on common “gray zone” scenarios where conflict of interest is not obvious, but still impacts independence, objectivity, or trust. Speakers will highlight where IRBs tend to over- or under-identify conflicts, how perception plays a critical role in decision-making, and what practical approaches can help ensure fair, transparent, and defensible review. Attendees will leave with a clearer framework for recognizing and navigating these everyday situations.