Post-Approval Monitoring (PAM) programs generate a steady stream of observations—but not every finding warrants corrective action, reporting, or escalation. Yet many IACUC programs struggle with inconsistent responses, overcorrection, or uncertainty about when a finding rises to the level of noncompliance or reportability. This 90-minute interactive workshop brings together real-world PAM scenarios, QA/QI strategies, and evolving reporting expectations to help attendees calibrate their responses. Drawing on institutional PAM models, procedural observation practices, and recent discussions around reporting gray areas, speakers will walk through how to distinguish between minor deviations, systemic issues, and reportable events. Attendees will leave with practical frameworks to support consistent, risk-based decision-making—strengthening both compliance and program credibility without creating unnecessary burden.
CPIA®: 1.5 continuing education credit hours